I’m shortening the title… Moving Online in Pandemic is now #MOIP! This is 6th in a series of posts about the tidal wave of moving online in the time of Covid-19. #1, #2, #3, #4 , #5 and #6. This time a client has graciously allow me to share their story!
I’ve been having a great time working with the Floodplains by Design Network (FbD), particularly the Culture and Capacity Building Action Group (C&C in our shorthand!). C&C members have targeted peer to peer (P2P) learning as an important tactic for identifying and sharing knowledge. One form of P2P learning is to ask for and get help from peers. Peer Assists are one format for the giving and getting of help. They help tap both local and network wide knowledge, support local contextualization (no “one ring to rule them all” as Frodo might wish), and are easy to do. Some even say it is pleasurable! This Spring the C&C members have committed to at least two Peer Assists. And to make them accessible across our wide geography, we decided to do them online. That turned out to be a wise choice given the Covid-19 outbreak.
About Peer Assists
There are many ways to do PAs. You can simply call up another network member and talk about your challenge. This is helpful for matching specific expertise with a specific need — and we recognize we need to figure out a mechanism so FbD members can easily find each other for this sort of direct exchange.
We also benefit from a diversity of views. Sometimes the most helpful ideas come from the “unusual suspects” and people who see and experience the world differently than we do. Here are some variations to consider:
- Troika Consulting , User Experience Fishbowl and Wise Crowds are three of my “go-to” peer assist variations. They create simple “containers” for people to get direct help on a challenge. The difference is that Troika works in an intimate trio, Wise Crowds uses rotating small groups to enable multiple people to get peer assistance, and Users Experience Fishbowl supports two layers of support – direct and indirect. It is a bit of hybrid option.
- If you are trying to elicit expertise, instead of trying to apply it in context, you can try or Celebrity Interview. THis is not exactly the same thing as peer to peer assistance, but by asking people questions, we often get more and deeper insights than if they just did a presentation. It is more engaging for those watching as well.
- Appreciative Interviews help pull out current success upon which we can build. So maybe one watershed has really made huge progress, but we can’t quite figure out how to make that same progress in our watersheds. Discovery and Action Dialog can help us discover who is succeeding where the rest of us are struggling. (A way of surfacing positive deviance!)
C&C’s First Peer Assist
In early April we had our first Peer Assist, helping Kat, a member move her work on a strategy element forward. She was looking for ideas about how to frame and build a strategy element that reflected views FROM the network, so a Peer Assist seemed useful. She identified some people she wanted present and others from the C&C volunteered to be her consultants. To help shine a light on the process and add another layer of support we invited the whole C&C to be the “bowl” of the fishbowl.
We convened on the Zoom video conferencing platform. In an hour Kat laid out her challenge, the “consultants” asked clarifying questions, and then Kat turned her back to her computer screen while her consultants talked about her challenge. After about 20 minutes she turned around, shared the key insights she gained and thanked her consultants.
At the end, we debrief and came up with the following observations to help improve our next Peer Assist:
- Great way of engaging. It takes courage — and you need to be truthful and honest about the feedback. Incorporate it in and be willing to accept the harsh reality.
- Lesson: French Revolution – king reached out but didn’t do anything with the input! Input –> heard, seen, respected and USED!Suggest that problem statement for peer assist be elaborated in written text and distributed to panel in advance so they can gather thoughts / questions
- +1 Some of my best thinking happens during drives/walks/showers/doing the dishes…
- From a Bowl person: Not quite sure how to engage, questions are relevant, but didn’t know what process looked like. How does this all work? (Lesson: not everyone got the same instructions in advance due to later additions of participants. Don’t let that slip through the cracks.)
- If more time engage the outer ring
- What would be a valuable question for a peer assist? Examples of questions, projects in different stages.
- How do we know about peer assist tool? Share more about the methodology (this article!)
- In times of Covid and working at home with kids → Evening Peer Assists after kids go to bed
- Humor: happy hour assists might cross certain lines, but the feedback would flow
Want more tips on how to do Peer Assists? Online and need to learn how to use zoom?
- Tips for Using Zoom https://docs.google.com/document/d/12iIDkSVYGnLaW4TQbjxX5CSJcICW_nmPehXoORK7_aA/edit?mc_cid=500dfe8de5&mc_eid=[UNIQID]
- Papers and Tip Sheets on Peer Assists https://www.odi.org/publications/5239-knowledge-sharing-and-learning-peer-assists, http://wiki.km4dev.org/Peer_Assists and https://kstoolkit.org/Peer%20Assists
- Video on how to do a classic Peer Assist https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObmQyW3EiiE
Want the geeky process details? Here is an outline of how you can set up your own Peer Assist using Users Experience Fishbowl method:
Preparation:
Identify your peer assistee. Ask if they have individuals they want as their consultants, and/or cast a net more widely. You do NOT need a large group. In this particular variation 3-4 consultants in the fishbowl with the peer assistee provides time for depth and sufficient intimacy for the conversation. Other useful folks are the “bowl” observing and sharing other ideas in chat which can be processed by the assistee later.
For a small group, one person can guide the process and take note. If there is a larger “bowl” of people it can be helpful to have one person to take notes in addition to the facilitator.
Invitation:
Send an invitation out. Draft copy below…
Thanks for being willing to do a peer assist. We are doing a peer assist variation called “Users Experience Fishbowl” where a small group of people support a person with a challenge or question (the “fish”) while other observers listen and respond afterwards.
Please come and help NAME OF PEER ASSISTEE think about her next steps with the CHALLENGE PERSON HAS. ADD THE PERSON’S CHALLENGING QUESTION HERE.
Technical Details: We’ll meet on a Zoom video platform so ideally you need a mic and a camera attached to your device. Best is a computer, then tablet, then phone. Log on a few minutes early if you are new to Zoom to make sure everything is running well. Due to the huge current loads on Zoom, sometimes it takes a few tries to get into a Zoom room… the days we live in!
Preparation: In preparation, we’ll send you WHATEVER YOU HAVE TO SEND. KEEP IT BRIEF to skim as time is available. Mostly bring your ears, your brains, experiences and insights from your floodplains work.
The X NUMBER OF FISH – YOU CAN NAME THEM will be ASSISTEE’S NAME consultants. Other interested folks will observe the process, staying off camera and just listen/ take notes in the Zoom chat.
How this will work: Tight 60 minute agenda
- 10 minutes: Brief introductions both of fish and “bowl folks.”
- 5 minutes: PEER ASSISTEE shares their challenge. (It is helpful if this builds on what was sent in advice, versus telling the same thing again.)
- 3-5 minutes: Consultants ask clarifying questions (no ideas, suggestions or their own stories yet.)
- 15-20 minutes: PEER ASSISTEE will turn off her Zoom camera, turn around with a notebook and simply listen as you talk about her challenge. She will not nod her head, respond, rebut or interject in any way. JUST LISTEN. As consultants, talk amongst yourselves with advice, experience, comparable stories. Range freely and think boldly. Dive into your experiences and data. The notetaker/facilitator will take notes.
- 5 minutes: PEER ASSISTEE will turn around and thank you, and if they want, share the most useful things they heard from you. They will share her next step in addressing their challenge.
- 10 minutes: Invite the observers to share any highlights or comments they noticed.
- 5 minutes: Debrief the process and outcomes.
Hello Nancy… I’ve just come off the Beehive Course…
Your site’s Contact Form isn’t working, so this is the next best way of contacting you!
Zoom froze on me during the course and when I re-entered the ‘room’ I’d lost the CHAT line. So I don’t have your answer to a question I posed about using Liberating Structures to design differently in an online context. (Not my day, techwise!)
Anyway, your answer was twofold… I can’t remember one part; and the second part was something about joining your SLACK community… Though I’ve heard of SLACK I’ve not used it. And I can’t find a way to join a SLACK community on your site.
So… that’s a bit of a muddle. Sorry to bother you, but if you can help I’d appreciate it. I’m interested in anything that can help me improve my practice and adapt my hosting and facilitation for an online context, if I can.
Happy to join a community if it’s practical (timewise) from Ireland 🙂
Hi Paula. Thanks for the heads up on the contact form. I’ll check that out! First, the LS Slack can be found here –> https://join.slack.com/t/liberatingstructures/shared_invite/zt-9oo5bleq-MXbN~HbHIAEG4SrBkYU~ng
The second is the calendar of events the community is sharing –> lots of ways to experiment/experience LS online! https://ls.qiqochat.com/events
Thanks Nancy… I see there’s a ton of stuff there. Will check it out further.